<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.2" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: DEFENDERS OF THE FAITH (GERS &#8230; 1 Sellik &#8230; 0)</title>
	<link>http://www.fateck.co.uk/index.php/2008/03/29/defenders-of-the-faith-gers-1-sellik-0/</link>
	<description>News and comment on Rangers FC.</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 06 Jul 2008 19:09:25 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: Fat Eck</title>
		<link>http://www.fateck.co.uk/index.php/2008/03/29/defenders-of-the-faith-gers-1-sellik-0/#comment-148506</link>
		<author>Fat Eck</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Apr 2008 19:12:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.fateck.co.uk/index.php/2008/03/29/defenders-of-the-faith-gers-1-sellik-0/#comment-148506</guid>
		<description>Thistledhub - That'llduhb nicely!

I was at Atalanta v Verona in serie B in April 1999 - big end-of-season promotion clash.  I stood on the Curva Pisani with the Atalanta ultras - only coz my Sister in Law was one of them, mind! - and I asked what I could shout over at the Veronese, to make me one of the Ragazzi.  Soon found out that the worst insult you can hurl in Italy - even between two Northern teams - is "NA-PO-LI-TA-NI"!!

Neopolitans get the same abuse in Italy as the North East does in France.  In fact the Neapolitans get it worse. So much worse. it really is a different country down there. And you just gotta love Napoli. As I stood there in my Jim Baxter retro-top, I couldn't believe all these good Catholic boys and girls around me were being so racist.

Oh no, wait a minute, I could believe it .  That's right - sorry - I remember now - I COULD believe it.   

"that must make Celtic the Napoli of Scotland" say our perpetually offended friends from across the toon.  Errrrrrm - NOh! - sorry. Napoli have won TWO league titles in their entire history and even that was only when they had Mara--fucking-Donna.  It's when ye see REAL subjugation that the whinging from the estate agents and bankers in the Broomloan on Saturday, all in front of their former Home Secretary chairman, becomes more insulting than laughable.

PLG had nothing to do with that banner, BTW!  True, in the past he's made some of the best banners in Europe but after six months working on the anti-North East flag the fellah who usually does all the stitching for the PSG flag-makers said he wisnae happy with the "fancy" way PLG was advising him tae use his needle and thread.  It was him or PLG - and everyone else working on the flag was pally with the other guy so ...  :-)

PSG still right in the relegation merde...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thistledhub - That&#8217;llduhb nicely!</p>
<p>I was at Atalanta v Verona in serie B in April 1999 - big end-of-season promotion clash.  I stood on the Curva Pisani with the Atalanta ultras - only coz my Sister in Law was one of them, mind! - and I asked what I could shout over at the Veronese, to make me one of the Ragazzi.  Soon found out that the worst insult you can hurl in Italy - even between two Northern teams - is &#8220;NA-PO-LI-TA-NI&#8221;!!</p>
<p>Neopolitans get the same abuse in Italy as the North East does in France.  In fact the Neapolitans get it worse. So much worse. it really is a different country down there. And you just gotta love Napoli. As I stood there in my Jim Baxter retro-top, I couldn&#8217;t believe all these good Catholic boys and girls around me were being so racist.</p>
<p>Oh no, wait a minute, I could believe it .  That&#8217;s right - sorry - I remember now - I COULD believe it.   </p>
<p>&#8220;that must make Celtic the Napoli of Scotland&#8221; say our perpetually offended friends from across the toon.  Errrrrrm - NOh! - sorry. Napoli have won TWO league titles in their entire history and even that was only when they had Mara&#8211;fucking-Donna.  It&#8217;s when ye see REAL subjugation that the whinging from the estate agents and bankers in the Broomloan on Saturday, all in front of their former Home Secretary chairman, becomes more insulting than laughable.</p>
<p>PLG had nothing to do with that banner, BTW!  True, in the past he&#8217;s made some of the best banners in Europe but after six months working on the anti-North East flag the fellah who usually does all the stitching for the PSG flag-makers said he wisnae happy with the &#8220;fancy&#8221; way PLG was advising him tae use his needle and thread.  It was him or PLG - and everyone else working on the flag was pally with the other guy so &#8230;  :-)</p>
<p>PSG still right in the relegation merde&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thistledhub</title>
		<link>http://www.fateck.co.uk/index.php/2008/03/29/defenders-of-the-faith-gers-1-sellik-0/#comment-148378</link>
		<author>Thistledhub</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Apr 2008 11:05:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.fateck.co.uk/index.php/2008/03/29/defenders-of-the-faith-gers-1-sellik-0/#comment-148378</guid>
		<description>Eck, I see that your best mate PLG has learned some things from his spell at Ibrox. :-)

After the Rangers getting a bad name for "sectarian" chanting, here are PSG fans showing the world how they feel about their country cousins.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/europe/7322902.stm

Sectarian? - or is that just between the Glasgow clubs?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Eck, I see that your best mate PLG has learned some things from his spell at Ibrox. :-)</p>
<p>After the Rangers getting a bad name for &#8220;sectarian&#8221; chanting, here are PSG fans showing the world how they feel about their country cousins.</p>
<p><a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/europe/7322902.stm" rel="nofollow">http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/europe/7322902.stm</a></p>
<p>Sectarian? - or is that just between the Glasgow clubs?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Boaby</title>
		<link>http://www.fateck.co.uk/index.php/2008/03/29/defenders-of-the-faith-gers-1-sellik-0/#comment-148163</link>
		<author>Boaby</author>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Mar 2008 22:54:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.fateck.co.uk/index.php/2008/03/29/defenders-of-the-faith-gers-1-sellik-0/#comment-148163</guid>
		<description>...... I meant the Shogun one......</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8230;&#8230; I meant the Shogun one&#8230;&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Boaby</title>
		<link>http://www.fateck.co.uk/index.php/2008/03/29/defenders-of-the-faith-gers-1-sellik-0/#comment-148162</link>
		<author>Boaby</author>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Mar 2008 22:50:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.fateck.co.uk/index.php/2008/03/29/defenders-of-the-faith-gers-1-sellik-0/#comment-148162</guid>
		<description>@LSR:

Brilliant link. Spat mah beer oot!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@LSR:</p>
<p>Brilliant link. Spat mah beer oot!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lone Star Ranger</title>
		<link>http://www.fateck.co.uk/index.php/2008/03/29/defenders-of-the-faith-gers-1-sellik-0/#comment-148155</link>
		<author>Lone Star Ranger</author>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Mar 2008 22:21:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.fateck.co.uk/index.php/2008/03/29/defenders-of-the-faith-gers-1-sellik-0/#comment-148155</guid>
		<description>Tell me who can watch this without grinnin'.... 8-)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bvV4Zvf2_20


hey you!...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tell me who can watch this without grinnin&#8217;&#8230;. 8-)</p>
<p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bvV4Zvf2_20" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bvV4Zvf2_20</a></p>
<p>hey you!&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fat Eck</title>
		<link>http://www.fateck.co.uk/index.php/2008/03/29/defenders-of-the-faith-gers-1-sellik-0/#comment-148099</link>
		<author>Fat Eck</author>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Mar 2008 19:43:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.fateck.co.uk/index.php/2008/03/29/defenders-of-the-faith-gers-1-sellik-0/#comment-148099</guid>
		<description>Shogun Emperor:

he's dah Crooklyn Bear extrordinaire,
comin' atya like he just don't muthafuckin care
rhymin' the Sash from Haarlem to Queens
and every crib, borough, sate and nation in between.

He's a lyrical Bluenose,
A scratchin ted;
Dis ain't no weak-ass tourist or boozed-up Glesgie ned!

He's no pranksta - he's oor gansta,
and he's doin it all with bling;
He's the shogun - shogun Emporah
and ya all gonnae hear him sing ....

(Daaaaaah, dud, dud, dud - Another one bites the dust ...)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Shogun Emperor:</p>
<p>he&#8217;s dah Crooklyn Bear extrordinaire,<br />
comin&#8217; atya like he just don&#8217;t muthafuckin care<br />
rhymin&#8217; the Sash from Haarlem to Queens<br />
and every crib, borough, sate and nation in between.</p>
<p>He&#8217;s a lyrical Bluenose,<br />
A scratchin ted;<br />
Dis ain&#8217;t no weak-ass tourist or boozed-up Glesgie ned!</p>
<p>He&#8217;s no pranksta - he&#8217;s oor gansta,<br />
and he&#8217;s doin it all with bling;<br />
He&#8217;s the shogun - shogun Emporah<br />
and ya all gonnae hear him sing &#8230;.</p>
<p>(Daaaaaah, dud, dud, dud - Another one bites the dust &#8230;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lone Star Ranger</title>
		<link>http://www.fateck.co.uk/index.php/2008/03/29/defenders-of-the-faith-gers-1-sellik-0/#comment-148043</link>
		<author>Lone Star Ranger</author>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Mar 2008 17:07:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.fateck.co.uk/index.php/2008/03/29/defenders-of-the-faith-gers-1-sellik-0/#comment-148043</guid>
		<description>This guys brilleeunt.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4Qm6WwwfriY

Shogun for President 8-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This guys brilleeunt.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4Qm6WwwfriY" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4Qm6WwwfriY</a></p>
<p>Shogun for President 8-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lone Star Ranger</title>
		<link>http://www.fateck.co.uk/index.php/2008/03/29/defenders-of-the-faith-gers-1-sellik-0/#comment-148031</link>
		<author>Lone Star Ranger</author>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Mar 2008 16:34:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.fateck.co.uk/index.php/2008/03/29/defenders-of-the-faith-gers-1-sellik-0/#comment-148031</guid>
		<description>That's just hilarious Thistledhub. I have a couple of mates over here that are big sellick men...I send them these wee gems to brighten up their day 8-)

Of course I could always wait until the lodge meeting and we can laugh about those conspiracy theories then ;-)


Does embdy remember the cup final where Roy Aitken took OUR throw in and the tims scored from it and won the cup? It seems to me that inept refeering is blind to whatever team you follow. These things happen to us all. In the NFL you have instant replays and coach's challenge's etc. Would this work for fitba? Maybe. All I can say is that the NFL has more or less taken out the wrong calls by officials...but at the expense of continuity. Maybe a manager could be limited to one challenge per game? Who knows...one other thing....the refs are very well trained and there are more of them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s just hilarious Thistledhub. I have a couple of mates over here that are big sellick men&#8230;I send them these wee gems to brighten up their day 8-)</p>
<p>Of course I could always wait until the lodge meeting and we can laugh about those conspiracy theories then ;-)</p>
<p>Does embdy remember the cup final where Roy Aitken took OUR throw in and the tims scored from it and won the cup? It seems to me that inept refeering is blind to whatever team you follow. These things happen to us all. In the NFL you have instant replays and coach&#8217;s challenge&#8217;s etc. Would this work for fitba? Maybe. All I can say is that the NFL has more or less taken out the wrong calls by officials&#8230;but at the expense of continuity. Maybe a manager could be limited to one challenge per game? Who knows&#8230;one other thing&#8230;.the refs are very well trained and there are more of them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thistledhub</title>
		<link>http://www.fateck.co.uk/index.php/2008/03/29/defenders-of-the-faith-gers-1-sellik-0/#comment-148009</link>
		<author>Thistledhub</author>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Mar 2008 15:45:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.fateck.co.uk/index.php/2008/03/29/defenders-of-the-faith-gers-1-sellik-0/#comment-148009</guid>
		<description>Have a look at this cracker from a "fair minded neutral" (my arse) on the Irish Soccer Website.......

&lt;em&gt; Officials deal Celtic a telling blow 
 
By Jonathan O’Reilly  

 Stuart Dougal and his team of officials were beset with a galling myopia at Ibrox on Saturday, as their errors and oversights allowed Rangers the leeway to close out a potentially decisive victory in the Scottish Premier League title race. 
 
There may be two more Old Firm games to come, both at Celtic Park, but Gordon Strachan conceded after Saturday’s 1-0 defeat that the destiny of the title is now out of his side’s hands. 

Perhaps the most galling thing at Ibrox was the decision-making of the officials, which often seemed to come down in Rangers’ favour. 

The failure of Dougal or his assistant, Keith Sorbie, to spot Kevin Thomson’s blatant attempt to cheat came at a crucial juncture. Thomson had been booked in the first half, and his loathsome dive should have elicited a red card. 

That he injured himself in the process, by trying to feign a tackle by Georgios Samaras, and left the field on a stretcher, will be small consolation to Celtic fans. 

Worse was to come for Celtic; treatment for Thomson’s injury alone lasted more than the three minutes which Dougal saw fit to add on at the end of the game. 

Taking into account the fact that five substitutions took place in the second half, a further three minutes of stoppage time would not have been out of place. 

Would Celtic, had they played against ten men for the final quarter hour and a further six minutes of injury time, have fancied their chances of sealing at least a point? In those circumstances, in such a crucial encounter, would a mere point have been satisfactory? 

The 2007/08 title run-in could yet require a significant footnote, pointed in the direction of officialdom. &lt;/em&gt;

Obviously a conspiracy. Just like helicopter Sunday!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Have a look at this cracker from a &#8220;fair minded neutral&#8221; (my arse) on the Irish Soccer Website&#8230;&#8230;.</p>
<p><em> Officials deal Celtic a telling blow </p>
<p>By Jonathan O’Reilly  </p>
<p> Stuart Dougal and his team of officials were beset with a galling myopia at Ibrox on Saturday, as their errors and oversights allowed Rangers the leeway to close out a potentially decisive victory in the Scottish Premier League title race. </p>
<p>There may be two more Old Firm games to come, both at Celtic Park, but Gordon Strachan conceded after Saturday’s 1-0 defeat that the destiny of the title is now out of his side’s hands. </p>
<p>Perhaps the most galling thing at Ibrox was the decision-making of the officials, which often seemed to come down in Rangers’ favour. </p>
<p>The failure of Dougal or his assistant, Keith Sorbie, to spot Kevin Thomson’s blatant attempt to cheat came at a crucial juncture. Thomson had been booked in the first half, and his loathsome dive should have elicited a red card. </p>
<p>That he injured himself in the process, by trying to feign a tackle by Georgios Samaras, and left the field on a stretcher, will be small consolation to Celtic fans. </p>
<p>Worse was to come for Celtic; treatment for Thomson’s injury alone lasted more than the three minutes which Dougal saw fit to add on at the end of the game. </p>
<p>Taking into account the fact that five substitutions took place in the second half, a further three minutes of stoppage time would not have been out of place. </p>
<p>Would Celtic, had they played against ten men for the final quarter hour and a further six minutes of injury time, have fancied their chances of sealing at least a point? In those circumstances, in such a crucial encounter, would a mere point have been satisfactory? </p>
<p>The 2007/08 title run-in could yet require a significant footnote, pointed in the direction of officialdom. </em></p>
<p>Obviously a conspiracy. Just like helicopter Sunday!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Barca72</title>
		<link>http://www.fateck.co.uk/index.php/2008/03/29/defenders-of-the-faith-gers-1-sellik-0/#comment-147970</link>
		<author>Barca72</author>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Mar 2008 13:57:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.fateck.co.uk/index.php/2008/03/29/defenders-of-the-faith-gers-1-sellik-0/#comment-147970</guid>
		<description>Great piece again big man totally spot on. Amms agree 100% aidenhino not even in the same bracket as big Carlos. Anyone else read the Records hotline today? I'm sorry to you guys who canny "bear" the aftermath of a victory for us because of their bleating but read that and tell me that doesny have you in fucking stitches.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great piece again big man totally spot on. Amms agree 100% aidenhino not even in the same bracket as big Carlos. Anyone else read the Records hotline today? I&#8217;m sorry to you guys who canny &#8220;bear&#8221; the aftermath of a victory for us because of their bleating but read that and tell me that doesny have you in fucking stitches.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: A Moses MacNeil Sandal</title>
		<link>http://www.fateck.co.uk/index.php/2008/03/29/defenders-of-the-faith-gers-1-sellik-0/#comment-147919</link>
		<author>A Moses MacNeil Sandal</author>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Mar 2008 11:39:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.fateck.co.uk/index.php/2008/03/29/defenders-of-the-faith-gers-1-sellik-0/#comment-147919</guid>
		<description>LSR - PMSL
Eck - Great piece as ever, I hope you're keeping the sharp things away from Bluebhoy today, I guess that would be his definition of a bad weekend. 

Is it just my memory or does anyone else remember Advocaat being criticised for asking why Lambert wasn't sent off when fouling Albertz, giving away a penalty and breaking his own jaw at Ibrox a few years ago?
Still the longer they think it's a conspiracy the longer it'll be before they try and fix what is clearly wrong with their, ahem, team. And if big Carlos isn't a better player this year than Aids Mcgeady then there truly is a conspiracy after all!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>LSR - PMSL<br />
Eck - Great piece as ever, I hope you&#8217;re keeping the sharp things away from Bluebhoy today, I guess that would be his definition of a bad weekend. </p>
<p>Is it just my memory or does anyone else remember Advocaat being criticised for asking why Lambert wasn&#8217;t sent off when fouling Albertz, giving away a penalty and breaking his own jaw at Ibrox a few years ago?<br />
Still the longer they think it&#8217;s a conspiracy the longer it&#8217;ll be before they try and fix what is clearly wrong with their, ahem, team. And if big Carlos isn&#8217;t a better player this year than Aids Mcgeady then there truly is a conspiracy after all!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Iggypup</title>
		<link>http://www.fateck.co.uk/index.php/2008/03/29/defenders-of-the-faith-gers-1-sellik-0/#comment-147866</link>
		<author>Iggypup</author>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Mar 2008 10:09:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.fateck.co.uk/index.php/2008/03/29/defenders-of-the-faith-gers-1-sellik-0/#comment-147866</guid>
		<description>In all this debate about referee's, there was an american football coach (forget who). Who once said, if a referee's decision had caused him to lose a game, then he had not done his prepararion properly. One other words if your good enough you should win regardless of decisions by officials. Maybe sellik supporters should bear (pardon the pun) that in mind.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In all this debate about referee&#8217;s, there was an american football coach (forget who). Who once said, if a referee&#8217;s decision had caused him to lose a game, then he had not done his prepararion properly. One other words if your good enough you should win regardless of decisions by officials. Maybe sellik supporters should bear (pardon the pun) that in mind.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thistledhub</title>
		<link>http://www.fateck.co.uk/index.php/2008/03/29/defenders-of-the-faith-gers-1-sellik-0/#comment-147842</link>
		<author>Thistledhub</author>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Mar 2008 09:13:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.fateck.co.uk/index.php/2008/03/29/defenders-of-the-faith-gers-1-sellik-0/#comment-147842</guid>
		<description>A good result. This goes a fair way in helping us win the league, but it is not done yet. Of course there is the standard conspiracy theory associated with a Glasgow derby, especially when the green half lose. Lets do the same to another team in green &#38; white hoops, because that is what the mind is focussed on now. Sorry, my Tim mates, but we are not interested in talking about the game, those 3 points are in the bag and for the moment we have bigger fish to fry (and it's not Friday!) Bring on the Portugese!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A good result. This goes a fair way in helping us win the league, but it is not done yet. Of course there is the standard conspiracy theory associated with a Glasgow derby, especially when the green half lose. Lets do the same to another team in green &amp; white hoops, because that is what the mind is focussed on now. Sorry, my Tim mates, but we are not interested in talking about the game, those 3 points are in the bag and for the moment we have bigger fish to fry (and it&#8217;s not Friday!) Bring on the Portugese!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LosPalmas7</title>
		<link>http://www.fateck.co.uk/index.php/2008/03/29/defenders-of-the-faith-gers-1-sellik-0/#comment-147821</link>
		<author>LosPalmas7</author>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Mar 2008 08:02:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.fateck.co.uk/index.php/2008/03/29/defenders-of-the-faith-gers-1-sellik-0/#comment-147821</guid>
		<description>Oh Lordy. scotsman.com makes a very valid point. For our Thomson I'll raise you a Brown, (Baresi) Caldwell and McManus, ALL shoe-in second bookings that the officials "let go". Swings, roundabouts,j'accuse,conspiracy,smoke and mirrors, the staple diet of post match Rangers victories in OF matches here in Scotland!
Oh happy days!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh Lordy. scotsman.com makes a very valid point. For our Thomson I&#8217;ll raise you a Brown, (Baresi) Caldwell and McManus, ALL shoe-in second bookings that the officials &#8220;let go&#8221;. Swings, roundabouts,j&#8217;accuse,conspiracy,smoke and mirrors, the staple diet of post match Rangers victories in OF matches here in Scotland!<br />
Oh happy days!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scotsman.com</title>
		<link>http://www.fateck.co.uk/index.php/2008/03/29/defenders-of-the-faith-gers-1-sellik-0/#comment-147715</link>
		<author>Scotsman.com</author>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Mar 2008 00:31:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.fateck.co.uk/index.php/2008/03/29/defenders-of-the-faith-gers-1-sellik-0/#comment-147715</guid>
		<description>Derfinition of paranoia

Thomson's goal, a slick one-two with Jean-Claude Darcheville ending with a precise low drive under the body of the Celtic goalkeeper, Artur Boruc, is not the kind of thing normally expected of a defensive midfielder. 

His manager, Walter Smith, however, would also not expect to see television pictures confirming Thomson as the offender in the later collision with Celtic striker Georgios Samaras.

As Thomson came in from the right, Samaras knocked the ball away, and the Rangers player swung his left foot, appearing to connect with his opponent's shin. Many of the 50,000-plus crowd, including Smith and, apparently, referee Dougal, did not see the challenge, but the TV pictures revealed an offence that merited at least a yellow card.

Dougal's stand-side assistant, Keith Sorbie, did have an unobstructed view of the incident, however, but did not bring it to the referee's attention. Having already been cautioned in the first half, Thomson should have been sent off. Instead,he was secured to a stretcher and carried off, replaced by substitute Charlie Adam.

The Rangers website reported yesterday that Thomson "is not as badly injured as first feared". It reported: "He (Thomson] was taken to hospital for xirays but they revealed that he has not suffered a fracture. He has soft tissue damage and is comfortable."

The collision with Samaras would lead to another puzzling development at the end of the match, when the fourth official, Craig Thomson, raised his board to indicate there would be three minutes of stoppage time. Setanta, who broadcast the match live, confirmed that the time devoted to Thomson's on-field treatment before his removal came to three-and-a-half minutes.

There were, in addition, five substitutions made during the second half – three by Smith, two by Celtic manager Gordon Strachan – for which each is normally allowed 30 seconds.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Derfinition of paranoia</p>
<p>Thomson&#8217;s goal, a slick one-two with Jean-Claude Darcheville ending with a precise low drive under the body of the Celtic goalkeeper, Artur Boruc, is not the kind of thing normally expected of a defensive midfielder. </p>
<p>His manager, Walter Smith, however, would also not expect to see television pictures confirming Thomson as the offender in the later collision with Celtic striker Georgios Samaras.</p>
<p>As Thomson came in from the right, Samaras knocked the ball away, and the Rangers player swung his left foot, appearing to connect with his opponent&#8217;s shin. Many of the 50,000-plus crowd, including Smith and, apparently, referee Dougal, did not see the challenge, but the TV pictures revealed an offence that merited at least a yellow card.</p>
<p>Dougal&#8217;s stand-side assistant, Keith Sorbie, did have an unobstructed view of the incident, however, but did not bring it to the referee&#8217;s attention. Having already been cautioned in the first half, Thomson should have been sent off. Instead,he was secured to a stretcher and carried off, replaced by substitute Charlie Adam.</p>
<p>The Rangers website reported yesterday that Thomson &#8220;is not as badly injured as first feared&#8221;. It reported: &#8220;He (Thomson] was taken to hospital for xirays but they revealed that he has not suffered a fracture. He has soft tissue damage and is comfortable.&#8221;</p>
<p>The collision with Samaras would lead to another puzzling development at the end of the match, when the fourth official, Craig Thomson, raised his board to indicate there would be three minutes of stoppage time. Setanta, who broadcast the match live, confirmed that the time devoted to Thomson&#8217;s on-field treatment before his removal came to three-and-a-half minutes.</p>
<p>There were, in addition, five substitutions made during the second half – three by Smith, two by Celtic manager Gordon Strachan – for which each is normally allowed 30 seconds.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lone Star Ranger</title>
		<link>http://www.fateck.co.uk/index.php/2008/03/29/defenders-of-the-faith-gers-1-sellik-0/#comment-147639</link>
		<author>Lone Star Ranger</author>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Mar 2008 18:19:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.fateck.co.uk/index.php/2008/03/29/defenders-of-the-faith-gers-1-sellik-0/#comment-147639</guid>
		<description>...aye...let's change it to 

"up to our &lt;i&gt;necks&lt;/i&gt; in fenian blood"

That should give the perpetually offended instant apoplexy and take the heat off the masons, referees, etc etc until the next OF game...


8-)



Oh the Bluebonnets are Blue.....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8230;aye&#8230;let&#8217;s change it to </p>
<p>&#8220;up to our <i>necks</i> in fenian blood&#8221;</p>
<p>That should give the perpetually offended instant apoplexy and take the heat off the masons, referees, etc etc until the next OF game&#8230;</p>
<p>8-)</p>
<p>Oh the Bluebonnets are Blue&#8230;..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jooster</title>
		<link>http://www.fateck.co.uk/index.php/2008/03/29/defenders-of-the-faith-gers-1-sellik-0/#comment-147615</link>
		<author>jooster</author>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Mar 2008 17:04:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.fateck.co.uk/index.php/2008/03/29/defenders-of-the-faith-gers-1-sellik-0/#comment-147615</guid>
		<description>Just read the previous thread but not the whole article as I'm getting square eyes. Great stuff, but your head will be getting big with all these words of praise Eck :-)

I would hereby like to start a competition to re-write the words of Hullo Hullo. My starter for ten...

Hullo Hullo, we are the teddy bears, 
Hullo Hullo, we really love the Gers
We'll follow them to everywhere until he day we die 
For we are the loyal Rangers boys


any others?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just read the previous thread but not the whole article as I&#8217;m getting square eyes. Great stuff, but your head will be getting big with all these words of praise Eck :-)</p>
<p>I would hereby like to start a competition to re-write the words of Hullo Hullo. My starter for ten&#8230;</p>
<p>Hullo Hullo, we are the teddy bears,<br />
Hullo Hullo, we really love the Gers<br />
We&#8217;ll follow them to everywhere until he day we die<br />
For we are the loyal Rangers boys</p>
<p>any others?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jooster</title>
		<link>http://www.fateck.co.uk/index.php/2008/03/29/defenders-of-the-faith-gers-1-sellik-0/#comment-147607</link>
		<author>jooster</author>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Mar 2008 16:38:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.fateck.co.uk/index.php/2008/03/29/defenders-of-the-faith-gers-1-sellik-0/#comment-147607</guid>
		<description>Spot on evaluation of our current situation Eck. There is still potential for this to be a 'so near yet so far' season if our mindset and discipline isn't exactly as you described. But what a season so far. It's almost unbelieveable that we are in with a shout of a quadruple considering where we came from a year or so ago. We should feel so proud to have Walter as our manager. He is the epitomy of everything a Rangers manager should be.

I noticed that you managed to engineer an opportunity to mention PLG again. If one didn't know better one would think that you are pineing for him :-)

Was is just me or was the half/full time coverage on Setanta tinted slightly green? Big Terry and Macca were reffering to 'tics total domination in the first half, Bazza'a shot accross the goal which was saved by Boruc was not mentioned, Macca was saying that had Brown got the penalty Celtic could have gone on to win by 3 or 4. Scott Booth- well, I always expect him to talk shite and he didn't dissapoint.

As for the ref, I thought he had a decent game. Yes, he didn't book Barry for dissent, but Scot Brown got a few warnings for much more aggresive talk back.

I'm probably telling an old joke now - I am in Czech Republic so maybe this has already done the rounds in Scotland.

A Viagra truck was seen making a delivery to parkhead. When questioned, GS explained ' we haven't been able to reach a semi all season and I thought could help'</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Spot on evaluation of our current situation Eck. There is still potential for this to be a &#8217;so near yet so far&#8217; season if our mindset and discipline isn&#8217;t exactly as you described. But what a season so far. It&#8217;s almost unbelieveable that we are in with a shout of a quadruple considering where we came from a year or so ago. We should feel so proud to have Walter as our manager. He is the epitomy of everything a Rangers manager should be.</p>
<p>I noticed that you managed to engineer an opportunity to mention PLG again. If one didn&#8217;t know better one would think that you are pineing for him :-)</p>
<p>Was is just me or was the half/full time coverage on Setanta tinted slightly green? Big Terry and Macca were reffering to &#8216;tics total domination in the first half, Bazza&#8217;a shot accross the goal which was saved by Boruc was not mentioned, Macca was saying that had Brown got the penalty Celtic could have gone on to win by 3 or 4. Scott Booth- well, I always expect him to talk shite and he didn&#8217;t dissapoint.</p>
<p>As for the ref, I thought he had a decent game. Yes, he didn&#8217;t book Barry for dissent, but Scot Brown got a few warnings for much more aggresive talk back.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m probably telling an old joke now - I am in Czech Republic so maybe this has already done the rounds in Scotland.</p>
<p>A Viagra truck was seen making a delivery to parkhead. When questioned, GS explained &#8216; we haven&#8217;t been able to reach a semi all season and I thought could help&#8217;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sumus Populi</title>
		<link>http://www.fateck.co.uk/index.php/2008/03/29/defenders-of-the-faith-gers-1-sellik-0/#comment-147556</link>
		<author>Sumus Populi</author>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Mar 2008 12:54:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.fateck.co.uk/index.php/2008/03/29/defenders-of-the-faith-gers-1-sellik-0/#comment-147556</guid>
		<description>Bluebhoy, I tried a wee friendly exchange of views but by your reactions you are obviously hurting badly.

I think Eck summed you lot up brilliantly!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bluebhoy, I tried a wee friendly exchange of views but by your reactions you are obviously hurting badly.</p>
<p>I think Eck summed you lot up brilliantly!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Davie</title>
		<link>http://www.fateck.co.uk/index.php/2008/03/29/defenders-of-the-faith-gers-1-sellik-0/#comment-147533</link>
		<author>Davie</author>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Mar 2008 11:14:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.fateck.co.uk/index.php/2008/03/29/defenders-of-the-faith-gers-1-sellik-0/#comment-147533</guid>
		<description>Celtic FC - Victims of injustice since 1888</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Celtic FC - Victims of injustice since 1888</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
